News from the AI & ML world
DeeperML - #softwaredevelopment
|
Steve Newman@Second Thoughts
//
New research suggests that the integration of AI coding tools into the development process may not be the productivity silver bullet many have assumed. A recent study conducted by METR, a non-profit AI benchmarking group, observed experienced open-source developers working on complex, mature codebases. Counterintuitively, the findings indicate that these AI tools actually slowed down task completion time by 19%. This slowdown is attributed to factors such as the time spent prompting the AI, waiting for responses, and meticulously reviewing and correcting the generated output. Despite this empirical evidence, many developers continued to use the tools, reporting that the work felt less effortful, even if it wasn't faster.
The study involved 16 seasoned developers and 246 real-world programming tasks. Before engaging with the AI tools, participants optimistically predicted a 24% increase in their productivity. However, after the trial, their revised estimates still overestimated the gains, believing AI had sped up their work by 20%, a stark contrast to the actual observed slowdown of 19%. Furthermore, fewer than 44% of the AI-generated code suggestions were accepted by the developers, with a significant portion of their time dedicated to refining or rewriting the AI's output. Lack of contextual knowledge and the complexity of existing repositories were cited as key reasons for the reduced effectiveness of the AI suggestions. While the study highlights a potential downside for experienced developers working on established projects, the researchers acknowledge that AI tools may offer greater benefits in other settings. These could include smaller projects, less experienced developers, or situations with different quality standards. This research adds a crucial layer of nuance to the broader narrative surrounding AI's impact on software development, suggesting that the benefits are not universal and may require careful evaluation on a case-by-case basis as the technology continues to evolve.
Share:
References :
Classification:
@www.apple.com
//
AI is rapidly changing the landscape of software development, presenting both opportunities and challenges for developers. While AI coding tools are boosting productivity on stable and mature technologies, some developers worry about the potential loss of the creative aspect of coding. Many developers enjoy the deep immersion and problem-solving that comes from traditional coding methods. The rise of AI-assisted coding necessitates a careful evaluation of which tasks should be delegated to AI and which should remain in the hands of human developers.
AI coding is particularly beneficial for well-established technologies like the C#/.NET stack, significantly increasing efficiency. Tools like Claude Code allow developers to delegate routine tasks, leading to faster development cycles. However, this shift can also lead to a sense of detachment from the creative process, where developers become more like curators, evaluating and tweaking AI-generated code rather than crafting each function from scratch. The concern is whether this new workflow will lead to an industry full of highly productive but less engaged developers. Despite these concerns, it appears that agentic coding is here to stay due to its efficiency, especially in smaller teams. Experts suggest preserving space for creative flow in some projects, perhaps by resisting the temptation to fully automate tasks in open-source projects. AI coding tools are also becoming more accessible, with platforms like VS Code extending support for Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, which integrate AI agents with various external tools and services. The future of software development will likely involve a balance between AI assistance and human creativity, requiring developers to adapt to new workflows and prioritize tasks that require human insight and innovation.
Share:
References :
Classification:
|
BenchmarksBlogsResearch Tools |